CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
HAW logo
Home team (Team B)
STAN logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
HAW logoHawai'i
1-2 ยท 53.2 PWR
91%

STAN win probability

Projected line: STAN -7.5

STAN logoStanford
1-1 ยท 65.3 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

35QB vs QB52

-7.1 STAN advantage โ€” 17-point index gap over Hawai'i (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). STAN FBS average.

37WR Room vs WR Room52

-6.3 STAN advantage โ€” 15-point index gap over Hawai'i (explosive pass rate and yards per target). STAN FBS average.

39RB Room vs RB Room53

-5.9 STAN advantage โ€” 14-point index gap over Hawai'i (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). STAN FBS average.

43Run Blocking vs Run Defense51

-3.4 STAN advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Hawai'i (line yards against stuff rate). STAN FBS average.

40Offensive Line vs Pass Rush49

-3.8 STAN advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Hawai'i (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). STAN FBS average.

36Pass Game vs Coverage50

-5.9 STAN advantage โ€” 14-point index gap over Hawai'i (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). STAN FBS average.

37Pass Rush vs Offensive Line55

-7.6 STAN advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Hawai'i (pressure differential in the trenches). STAN FBS average.

39Coverage vs Pass Game52

-5.5 STAN advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over Hawai'i (coverage grade against target efficiency). STAN FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.