CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
UGA logo
Home team (Team B)
ARK logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Georgia is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

UGA logoGeorgia
2-0 ยท 90.0 PWR
96%

UGA win probability

Projected line: UGA -12.8

ARK logoArkansas
1-1 ยท 69.4 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

79QB vs QB59

+8.4 UGA advantage โ€” 20-point index gap over Arkansas (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). UGA Top 25 level.

76WR Room vs WR Room56

+8.4 UGA advantage โ€” 20-point index gap over Arkansas (explosive pass rate and yards per target). UGA Top 25 level.

88RB Room vs RB Room52

+15.1 UGA advantage โ€” 36-point index gap over Arkansas (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). UGA Top 25 level.

86Run Blocking vs Run Defense59

+11.3 UGA advantage โ€” 27-point index gap over Arkansas (line yards against stuff rate). UGA Top 25 level.

81Offensive Line vs Pass Rush59

+9.2 UGA advantage โ€” 22-point index gap over Arkansas (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). UGA Top 25 level.

77Pass Game vs Coverage61

+6.7 UGA advantage โ€” 16-point index gap over Arkansas (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). UGA Top 25 level.

74Pass Rush vs Offensive Line55

+8.0 UGA advantage โ€” 19-point index gap over Arkansas (pressure differential in the trenches). UGA Top 25 level.

75Coverage vs Pass Game57

+7.6 UGA advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Arkansas (coverage grade against target efficiency). UGA Top 25 level.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.