CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
FAU logo
Home team (Team B)
FLA logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Florida Atlantic is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

FAU logoFlorida Atlantic
1-1 ยท 51.7 PWR
96%

FLA win probability

Projected line: FLA -19.3

FLA logoFlorida
2-0 ยท 82.8 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

41QB vs QB72

-13.0 FLA advantage โ€” 31-point index gap over Florida Atlantic (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). FLA Top 25 level.

42WR Room vs WR Room72

-12.6 FLA advantage โ€” 30-point index gap over Florida Atlantic (explosive pass rate and yards per target). FLA Top 25 level.

47RB Room vs RB Room72

-10.5 FLA advantage โ€” 25-point index gap over Florida Atlantic (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). FLA Top 25 level.

51Run Blocking vs Run Defense57

-2.5 FLA advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Florida Atlantic (line yards against stuff rate). FLA FBS average.

47Offensive Line vs Pass Rush64

-7.1 FLA advantage โ€” 17-point index gap over Florida Atlantic (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). FLA Above average.

41Pass Game vs Coverage68

-11.3 FLA advantage โ€” 27-point index gap over Florida Atlantic (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). FLA Above average.

41Pass Rush vs Offensive Line67

-10.9 FLA advantage โ€” 26-point index gap over Florida Atlantic (pressure differential in the trenches). FLA Above average.

37Coverage vs Pass Game73

-15.1 FLA advantage โ€” 36-point index gap over Florida Atlantic (coverage grade against target efficiency). FLA Top 25 level.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.