CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
COLO logo
Home team (Team B)
MIA logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
COLO logoColorado
2-0 ยท 75.6 PWR
81%

MIA win probability

Projected line: MIA -5.7

MIA logoMiami
2-0 ยท 84.8 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

50QB vs QB75

-10.5 MIA advantage โ€” 25-point index gap over Colorado (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). MIA Top 25 level.

50WR Room vs WR Room73

-9.7 MIA advantage โ€” 23-point index gap over Colorado (explosive pass rate and yards per target). MIA Top 25 level.

53RB Room vs RB Room62

-3.8 MIA advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Colorado (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). MIA Above average.

54Run Blocking vs Run Defense64

-4.2 MIA advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Colorado (line yards against stuff rate). MIA Above average.

55Offensive Line vs Pass Rush60

-2.1 MIA advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Colorado (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). MIA Above average.

50Pass Game vs Coverage64

-5.9 MIA advantage โ€” 14-point index gap over Colorado (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). MIA Above average.

58Pass Rush vs Offensive Line70

-5.0 MIA advantage โ€” 12-point index gap over Colorado (pressure differential in the trenches). MIA Above average.

52Coverage vs Pass Game74

-9.2 MIA advantage โ€” 22-point index gap over Colorado (coverage grade against target efficiency). MIA Top 25 level.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.