CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
EMU logo
Home team (Team B)
WIS logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
EMU logoEastern Michigan
1-2 ยท 53.0 PWR
96%

WIS win probability

Projected line: WIS -10.3

WIS logoWisconsin
1-1 ยท 69.6 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

39QB vs QB54

-6.3 WIS advantage โ€” 15-point index gap over Eastern Michigan (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). WIS FBS average.

41WR Room vs WR Room56

-6.3 WIS advantage โ€” 15-point index gap over Eastern Michigan (explosive pass rate and yards per target). WIS FBS average.

39RB Room vs RB Room50

-4.6 WIS advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Eastern Michigan (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). WIS FBS average.

40Run Blocking vs Run Defense52

-5.0 WIS advantage โ€” 12-point index gap over Eastern Michigan (line yards against stuff rate). WIS FBS average.

44Offensive Line vs Pass Rush53

-3.8 WIS advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Eastern Michigan (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). WIS FBS average.

40Pass Game vs Coverage53

-5.5 WIS advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over Eastern Michigan (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). WIS FBS average.

43Pass Rush vs Offensive Line54

-4.6 WIS advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Eastern Michigan (pressure differential in the trenches). WIS FBS average.

46Coverage vs Pass Game56

-4.2 WIS advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Eastern Michigan (coverage grade against target efficiency). WIS FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.