CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
EMU logo
Home team (Team B)
MSU logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Eastern Michigan is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

EMU logoEastern Michigan
1-2 ยท 53.0 PWR
96%

MSU win probability

Projected line: MSU -10.8

MSU logoMichigan State
2-0 ยท 70.5 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

39QB vs QB51

-5.0 MSU advantage โ€” 12-point index gap over Eastern Michigan (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). MSU FBS average.

41WR Room vs WR Room51

-4.2 MSU advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Eastern Michigan (explosive pass rate and yards per target). MSU FBS average.

39RB Room vs RB Room48

-3.8 MSU advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Eastern Michigan (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). MSU FBS average.

40Run Blocking vs Run Defense58

-7.6 MSU advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Eastern Michigan (line yards against stuff rate). MSU Above average.

44Offensive Line vs Pass Rush55

-4.6 MSU advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Eastern Michigan (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). MSU FBS average.

40Pass Game vs Coverage50

-4.2 MSU advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Eastern Michigan (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). MSU FBS average.

43Pass Rush vs Offensive Line50

-2.9 MSU advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Eastern Michigan (pressure differential in the trenches). MSU FBS average.

46Coverage vs Pass Game51

-2.1 MSU advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Eastern Michigan (coverage grade against target efficiency). MSU FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.