CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
COLO logo
Home team (Team B)
TLSA logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
COLO logoColorado
2-0 ยท 75.6 PWR
87%

COLO win probability

Projected line: COLO -6.8

TLSA logoTulsa
2-0 ยท 64.6 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

50QB vs QB47

+1.3 COLO advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Tulsa (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). COLO FBS average.

50WR Room vs WR Room46

+1.7 COLO advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over Tulsa (explosive pass rate and yards per target). COLO FBS average.

53RB Room vs RB Room44

+3.8 COLO advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Tulsa (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). COLO FBS average.

54Run Blocking vs Run Defense47

+2.9 COLO advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Tulsa (line yards against stuff rate). COLO FBS average.

55Offensive Line vs Pass Rush43

+5.0 COLO advantage โ€” 12-point index gap over Tulsa (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). COLO FBS average.

50Pass Game vs Coverage47

+1.3 COLO advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Tulsa (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). COLO FBS average.

58Pass Rush vs Offensive Line49

+3.8 COLO advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Tulsa (pressure differential in the trenches). COLO Above average.

52Coverage vs Pass Game47

+2.1 COLO advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Tulsa (coverage grade against target efficiency). COLO FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.