CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
DUKE logo
Home team (Team B)
ILL logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
DUKE logoDuke
2-0 ยท 70.2 PWR
53%

DUKE win probability

Projected line: DUKE -0.6

ILL logoIllinois
1-1 ยท 69.3 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

41QB vs QB59

-7.6 ILL advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Duke (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). ILL Above average.

44WR Room vs WR Room58

-5.9 ILL advantage โ€” 14-point index gap over Duke (explosive pass rate and yards per target). ILL Above average.

50RB Room vs RB Room53

-1.3 ILL advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Duke (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). ILL FBS average.

50Run Blocking vs Run Defense45

+2.1 DUKE advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Illinois (line yards against stuff rate). DUKE FBS average.

51Offensive Line vs Pass Rush49

+0.8 DUKE advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Illinois (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). DUKE FBS average.

43Pass Game vs Coverage53

-4.2 ILL advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Duke (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). ILL FBS average.

54Pass Rush vs Offensive Line56

-0.8 ILL advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Duke (pressure differential in the trenches). ILL FBS average.

53Coverage vs Pass Game59

-2.5 ILL advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Duke (coverage grade against target efficiency). ILL Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.