CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
DEL logo
Home team (Team B)
VAN logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
DEL logoDelaware
1-1 ยท 48.1 PWR
96%

VAN win probability

Projected line: VAN -14.3

VAN logoVanderbilt
2-0 ยท 71.2 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

37QB vs QB54

-7.1 VAN advantage โ€” 17-point index gap over Delaware (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). VAN FBS average.

38WR Room vs WR Room52

-5.9 VAN advantage โ€” 14-point index gap over Delaware (explosive pass rate and yards per target). VAN FBS average.

30RB Room vs RB Room55

-10.5 VAN advantage โ€” 25-point index gap over Delaware (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). VAN FBS average.

25Run Blocking vs Run Defense50

-10.5 VAN advantage โ€” 25-point index gap over Delaware (line yards against stuff rate). VAN FBS average.

33Offensive Line vs Pass Rush61

-11.8 VAN advantage โ€” 28-point index gap over Delaware (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). VAN Above average.

37Pass Game vs Coverage56

-8.0 VAN advantage โ€” 19-point index gap over Delaware (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). VAN FBS average.

32Pass Rush vs Offensive Line57

-10.5 VAN advantage โ€” 25-point index gap over Delaware (pressure differential in the trenches). VAN FBS average.

34Coverage vs Pass Game52

-7.6 VAN advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Delaware (coverage grade against target efficiency). VAN FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.