CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
COLO logo
Home team (Team B)
CMU logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
COLO logoColorado
2-0 ยท 75.6 PWR
96%

COLO win probability

Projected line: COLO -18.4

CMU logoCentral Michigan
1-1 ยท 46.0 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

50QB vs QB27

+9.7 COLO advantage โ€” 23-point index gap over Central Michigan (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). COLO FBS average.

50WR Room vs WR Room28

+9.2 COLO advantage โ€” 22-point index gap over Central Michigan (explosive pass rate and yards per target). COLO FBS average.

53RB Room vs RB Room39

+5.9 COLO advantage โ€” 14-point index gap over Central Michigan (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). COLO FBS average.

54Run Blocking vs Run Defense31

+9.7 COLO advantage โ€” 23-point index gap over Central Michigan (line yards against stuff rate). COLO FBS average.

55Offensive Line vs Pass Rush38

+7.1 COLO advantage โ€” 17-point index gap over Central Michigan (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). COLO FBS average.

50Pass Game vs Coverage40

+4.2 COLO advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Central Michigan (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). COLO FBS average.

58Pass Rush vs Offensive Line31

+11.3 COLO advantage โ€” 27-point index gap over Central Michigan (pressure differential in the trenches). COLO Above average.

52Coverage vs Pass Game28

+10.1 COLO advantage โ€” 24-point index gap over Central Michigan (coverage grade against target efficiency). COLO FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.