CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
CLEM logo
Home team (Team B)
LSU logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
CLEM logoClemson
1-1 ยท 75.3 PWR
96%

LSU win probability

Projected line: LSU -8.3

LSU logoLSU
2-0 ยท 88.7 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

50QB vs QB68

-7.6 LSU advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Clemson (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). LSU Above average.

54WR Room vs WR Room67

-5.5 LSU advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over Clemson (explosive pass rate and yards per target). LSU Above average.

52RB Room vs RB Room71

-8.0 LSU advantage โ€” 19-point index gap over Clemson (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). LSU Above average.

47Run Blocking vs Run Defense81

-14.3 LSU advantage โ€” 34-point index gap over Clemson (line yards against stuff rate). LSU Top 25 level.

49Offensive Line vs Pass Rush77

-11.8 LSU advantage โ€” 28-point index gap over Clemson (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). LSU Top 25 level.

53Pass Game vs Coverage77

-10.1 LSU advantage โ€” 24-point index gap over Clemson (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). LSU Top 25 level.

59Pass Rush vs Offensive Line72

-5.5 LSU advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over Clemson (pressure differential in the trenches). LSU Top 25 level.

61Coverage vs Pass Game68

-2.9 LSU advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Clemson (coverage grade against target efficiency). LSU Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.