CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
CLT logo
Home team (Team B)
APP logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Charlotte is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

CLT logoCharlotte
0-2 ยท 52.1 PWR
85%

APP win probability

Projected line: APP -6.4

APP logoApp State
2-0 ยท 62.4 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

44QB vs QB55

-4.6 APP advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Charlotte (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). APP FBS average.

45WR Room vs WR Room53

-3.4 APP advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Charlotte (explosive pass rate and yards per target). APP FBS average.

50RB Room vs RB Room50

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

47Run Blocking vs Run Defense47

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

47Offensive Line vs Pass Rush49

-0.8 APP advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Charlotte (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). APP FBS average.

45Pass Game vs Coverage53

-3.4 APP advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Charlotte (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). APP FBS average.

46Pass Rush vs Offensive Line49

-1.3 APP advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Charlotte (pressure differential in the trenches). APP FBS average.

40Coverage vs Pass Game53

-5.5 APP advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over Charlotte (coverage grade against target efficiency). APP FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.