CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
COLO logo
Home team (Team B)
FLA logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
COLO logoColorado
2-0 ยท 75.6 PWR
74%

FLA win probability

Projected line: FLA -4.5

FLA logoFlorida
2-0 ยท 82.8 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

50QB vs QB72

-9.2 FLA advantage โ€” 22-point index gap over Colorado (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). FLA Top 25 level.

50WR Room vs WR Room72

-9.2 FLA advantage โ€” 22-point index gap over Colorado (explosive pass rate and yards per target). FLA Top 25 level.

53RB Room vs RB Room72

-8.0 FLA advantage โ€” 19-point index gap over Colorado (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). FLA Top 25 level.

54Run Blocking vs Run Defense57

-1.3 FLA advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Colorado (line yards against stuff rate). FLA FBS average.

55Offensive Line vs Pass Rush64

-3.8 FLA advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Colorado (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). FLA Above average.

50Pass Game vs Coverage68

-7.6 FLA advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Colorado (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). FLA Above average.

58Pass Rush vs Offensive Line67

-3.8 FLA advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Colorado (pressure differential in the trenches). FLA Above average.

52Coverage vs Pass Game73

-8.8 FLA advantage โ€” 21-point index gap over Colorado (coverage grade against target efficiency). FLA Top 25 level.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.