CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
BGSU logo
Home team (Team B)
NEB logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Bowling Green is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

BGSU logoBowling Green
0-2 ยท 46.5 PWR
96%

NEB win probability

Projected line: NEB -19.7

NEB logoNebraska
2-0 ยท 78.3 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

44QB vs QB61

-7.1 NEB advantage โ€” 17-point index gap over Bowling Green (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). NEB Above average.

43WR Room vs WR Room62

-8.0 NEB advantage โ€” 19-point index gap over Bowling Green (explosive pass rate and yards per target). NEB Above average.

34RB Room vs RB Room65

-13.0 NEB advantage โ€” 31-point index gap over Bowling Green (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). NEB Above average.

36Run Blocking vs Run Defense54

-7.6 NEB advantage โ€” 18-point index gap over Bowling Green (line yards against stuff rate). NEB FBS average.

45Offensive Line vs Pass Rush60

-6.3 NEB advantage โ€” 15-point index gap over Bowling Green (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). NEB Above average.

43Pass Game vs Coverage63

-8.4 NEB advantage โ€” 20-point index gap over Bowling Green (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). NEB Above average.

38Pass Rush vs Offensive Line60

-9.2 NEB advantage โ€” 22-point index gap over Bowling Green (pressure differential in the trenches). NEB Above average.

38Coverage vs Pass Game62

-10.1 NEB advantage โ€” 24-point index gap over Bowling Green (coverage grade against target efficiency). NEB Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.