CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
COLO logo
Home team (Team B)
VAN logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
COLO logoColorado
2-0 ยท 75.6 PWR
65%

COLO win probability

Projected line: COLO -2.7

VAN logoVanderbilt
2-0 ยท 71.2 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

50QB vs QB54

-1.7 VAN advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over Colorado (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). VAN FBS average.

50WR Room vs WR Room52

-0.8 VAN advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Colorado (explosive pass rate and yards per target). VAN FBS average.

53RB Room vs RB Room55

-0.8 VAN advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Colorado (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). VAN FBS average.

54Run Blocking vs Run Defense50

+1.7 COLO advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over Vanderbilt (line yards against stuff rate). COLO FBS average.

55Offensive Line vs Pass Rush61

-2.5 VAN advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Colorado (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). VAN Above average.

50Pass Game vs Coverage56

-2.5 VAN advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Colorado (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). VAN FBS average.

58Pass Rush vs Offensive Line57

+0.4 COLO advantage โ€” 1-point index gap over Vanderbilt (pressure differential in the trenches). COLO Above average.

52Coverage vs Pass Game52

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.