CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
ARST logo
Home team (Team B)
TCU logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
ARST logoArkansas State
1-1 ยท 57.8 PWR
96%

TCU win probability

Projected line: TCU -8.8

TCU logoTCU
1-1 ยท 72.0 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

46QB vs QB49

-1.3 TCU advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Arkansas State (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). TCU FBS average.

46WR Room vs WR Room51

-2.1 TCU advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Arkansas State (explosive pass rate and yards per target). TCU FBS average.

46RB Room vs RB Room51

-2.1 TCU advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Arkansas State (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). TCU FBS average.

47Run Blocking vs Run Defense54

-2.9 TCU advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Arkansas State (line yards against stuff rate). TCU FBS average.

43Offensive Line vs Pass Rush56

-5.5 TCU advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over Arkansas State (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). TCU FBS average.

47Pass Game vs Coverage54

-2.9 TCU advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Arkansas State (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). TCU FBS average.

40Pass Rush vs Offensive Line51

-4.6 TCU advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Arkansas State (pressure differential in the trenches). TCU FBS average.

33Coverage vs Pass Game50

-7.1 TCU advantage โ€” 17-point index gap over Arkansas State (coverage grade against target efficiency). TCU FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.