CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
ARST logo
Home team (Team B)
MEM logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT
ARST logoArkansas State
1-1 ยท 57.8 PWR
75%

MEM win probability

Projected line: MEM -4.7

MEM logoMemphis
2-1 ยท 65.3 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

46QB vs QB55

-3.8 MEM advantage โ€” 9-point index gap over Arkansas State (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). MEM FBS average.

46WR Room vs WR Room54

-3.4 MEM advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Arkansas State (explosive pass rate and yards per target). MEM FBS average.

46RB Room vs RB Room54

-3.4 MEM advantage โ€” 8-point index gap over Arkansas State (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). MEM FBS average.

47Run Blocking vs Run Defense47

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

43Offensive Line vs Pass Rush53

-4.2 MEM advantage โ€” 10-point index gap over Arkansas State (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). MEM FBS average.

47Pass Game vs Coverage49

-0.8 MEM advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Arkansas State (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). MEM FBS average.

40Pass Rush vs Offensive Line53

-5.5 MEM advantage โ€” 13-point index gap over Arkansas State (pressure differential in the trenches). MEM FBS average.

33Coverage vs Pass Game55

-9.2 MEM advantage โ€” 22-point index gap over Arkansas State (coverage grade against target efficiency). MEM FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.