CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
COLO logo
Home team (Team B)
MIZ logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Colorado is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

COLO logoColorado
2-0 ยท 75.6 PWR
65%

MIZ win probability

Projected line: MIZ -2.7

MIZ logoMissouri
2-0 ยท 79.9 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

50QB vs QB69

-8.0 MIZ advantage โ€” 19-point index gap over Colorado (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). MIZ Above average.

50WR Room vs WR Room66

-6.7 MIZ advantage โ€” 16-point index gap over Colorado (explosive pass rate and yards per target). MIZ Above average.

53RB Room vs RB Room59

-2.5 MIZ advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Colorado (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). MIZ Above average.

54Run Blocking vs Run Defense61

-2.9 MIZ advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Colorado (line yards against stuff rate). MIZ Above average.

55Offensive Line vs Pass Rush60

-2.1 MIZ advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Colorado (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). MIZ Above average.

50Pass Game vs Coverage67

-7.1 MIZ advantage โ€” 17-point index gap over Colorado (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). MIZ Above average.

58Pass Rush vs Offensive Line64

-2.5 MIZ advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Colorado (pressure differential in the trenches). MIZ Above average.

52Coverage vs Pass Game67

-6.3 MIZ advantage โ€” 15-point index gap over Colorado (coverage grade against target efficiency). MIZ Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.