CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
ARK logo
Home team (Team B)
UTAH logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Arkansas is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

ARK logoArkansas
1-1 ยท 69.4 PWR
80%

UTAH win probability

Projected line: UTAH -5.4

UTAH logoUtah
2-0 ยท 78.1 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

59QB vs QB59

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

56WR Room vs WR Room58

-0.8 UTAH advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Arkansas (explosive pass rate and yards per target). UTAH Above average.

52RB Room vs RB Room59

-2.9 UTAH advantage โ€” 7-point index gap over Arkansas (yards per carry, line yards and rush EPA). UTAH Above average.

53Run Blocking vs Run Defense51

+0.8 ARK advantage โ€” 2-point index gap over Utah (line yards against stuff rate). ARK FBS average.

55Offensive Line vs Pass Rush51

+1.7 ARK advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over Utah (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). ARK FBS average.

57Pass Game vs Coverage56

+0.4 ARK advantage โ€” 1-point index gap over Utah (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). ARK FBS average.

59Pass Rush vs Offensive Line59

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

61Coverage vs Pass Game58

+1.3 ARK advantage โ€” 3-point index gap over Utah (coverage grade against target efficiency). ARK Above average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.