CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub

Composite projection engine

Matchup Simulator

Away team (Team A)
COLO logo
Home team (Team B)
USM logo
ABC| Sat 1:30 PM MT

Color clash detected โ€” Colorado is shown in their alternate road accent for contrast.

COLO logoColorado
2-0 ยท 75.6 PWR
96%

COLO win probability

Projected line: COLO -12.2

USM logoSouthern Miss
1-1 ยท 56.0 PWR

Positional unit index โ€” 0 to 100 scale

50 = FBS average ยท 72+ = Top 25 level ยท 90+ = elite national top five. Week 3 weighting: 60% preseason roster talent + 40% live 2026 game EPA.

50QB vs QB49

+0.4 COLO advantage โ€” 1-point index gap over Southern Miss (passing EPA per play, completion rate and yards per attempt). COLO FBS average.

50WR Room vs WR Room46

+1.7 COLO advantage โ€” 4-point index gap over Southern Miss (explosive pass rate and yards per target). COLO FBS average.

53RB Room vs RB Room53

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

54Run Blocking vs Run Defense54

Even matchup โ€” both units index the same

55Offensive Line vs Pass Rush44

+4.6 COLO advantage โ€” 11-point index gap over Southern Miss (pass-block win rate against pressure rate). COLO FBS average.

50Pass Game vs Coverage45

+2.1 COLO advantage โ€” 5-point index gap over Southern Miss (passing EPA against coverage efficiency). COLO FBS average.

58Pass Rush vs Offensive Line52

+2.5 COLO advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Southern Miss (pressure differential in the trenches). COLO Above average.

52Coverage vs Pass Game46

+2.5 COLO advantage โ€” 6-point index gap over Southern Miss (coverage grade against target efficiency). COLO FBS average.

Projections use opponent-adjusted efficiency, SOS, and unit-level grades derived from live 2026 team data.