Vegas Line
Colorado State -2.5
Total 46.5
Model Projection
CSU -6.0
CSU 71.6% win · O/U 46.5
Value Edge
3.5 pt edge: CSU
Total delta 0.0
Model Rationale
Shifted by +5.3 pts toward CSU on the 2026 2-game sample vs. the historical baseline.
- Phase
- Sample phase
- 2026 sample
- 2 games · 50%
- Historical baseline
- 50%
- Baseline margin
- WYO -0.7
- CSU: 0 portal additions / 1 departures, first year under Jim Mora — 2021–2025 archive weighted 67%, incoming portal talent −0.8 pts.

Wyoming — Keys to Victory
1Establish the run
Colorado State ranks #88 nationally allowing 143.0 rush yards per game — softer than their #42 pass defense.
2Contain Jayden Brown
Colorado State's top producer this season: 57 rushing yards (RB). Their production line is the first thing Wyoming has to take away.
3Stay ahead on third down
Wyoming converts 0.0% of third downs (#138 nationally) versus Colorado State's 46.7%. Sustaining drives is the cleanest edge on the board.
4Fix the turnover margin
Wyoming is -4 in turnover margin (0 forced, 4 lost) across 1 recorded games; Colorado State sits at +4.
5Clear 24 points
The market total for this game is 46.5. Anything above 24 points puts Wyoming on the winning side of an even split.

Colorado State — Keys to Victory
1Attack through the air
Wyoming ranks #100 nationally allowing 242.0 pass yards per game — a softer target than their #98 run defense.
2Contain Samuel Harris
Wyoming's top producer this season: 63 rushing yards (RB). Their production line is the first thing Colorado State has to take away.
3Stay ahead on third down
Colorado State converts 46.7% of third downs (#56 nationally) versus Wyoming's 0.0%. Sustaining drives is the cleanest edge on the board.
4Protect the turnover edge
Colorado State is +4 in turnover margin (4 forced, 0 lost) across 1 recorded games; Wyoming sits at -4.
5Clear 24 points
The market total for this game is 46.5. Anything above 24 points puts Colorado State on the winning side of an even split.
Key Position Matchups
Quarterbacks
Tyler HughesWYO · QB
- Passing Yds
- 130
- Completion %
- 63.2%
- Yards / Attempt
- 6.8
- TD : INT
- 0 : 3
- TD/INT Ratio
- 0.00:1
- Passer Rating
- 89.1
Hauss HejnyCSU · QB
- Passing Yds
- 214
- Completion %
- 69.7%
- Yards / Attempt
- 6.5
- TD : INT
- 5 : 0
- TD/INT Ratio
- No INTs
- Passer Rating
- 174.2
Leading Rusher
Samuel HarrisWYO · RB
- Rushing Yds
- 63
- Carries
- 16
- Yards / Carry
- 3.9
- Rushing TD
- 0
- Long
- 15
Jayden BrownCSU · RB
- Rushing Yds
- 57
- Carries
- 8
- Yards / Carry
- 7.1
- Rushing TD
- 0
- Long
- 37
Primary Receiver
Jake WilsonWYO · TE
- Receiving Yds
- 51
- Receptions
- 2
- Yards / Catch
- 25.5
- Receiving TD
- 0
- Long
- 29
Reginald Vick JrCSU · WR
- Receiving Yds
- 75
- Receptions
- 6
- Yards / Catch
- 12.5
- Receiving TD
- 3
- Long
- 57
Defensive Leader
Ethan StuhlsatzWYO · LB
- Tackles
- 15
- Solo
- 3
- Sacks
- 0.0
- TFL
- 0.5
- INT
- 0
Jaseim MitchellCSU · LB
- Tackles
- 11
- Solo
- 4
- Sacks
- 0.0
- TFL
- 0.0
- INT
- 0
Matchup Simulator
Starts from the CFB 360 projection for this exact game. Turnover swings are valued at 4.2 points each; pace scales the projected total against a 140-play baseline.
Simulated Winner
CSU by 6.0
Baseline CSU -6.0
Simulated Total
46.5
Baseline 46.5
Unit Edge
CSU QB
CSU FBS average · WYO Below average
WYO passing vs CSU coverage
| 130.0 | Passing YPG vs Pass yards allowed / G | 130.0 |
| 63.2% | Completion % vs Yards / Target allowed | 6.8 |
| 6.8 | Yards / Attempt vs Completion % allowed | 63.2% |
| 0.00:1 | TD / INT ratio vs Sack / pressure rate | 10.5% |
| 0.109 | EPA / Pass vs Defensive EPA / Pass | 0.109 |
WYO rushing vs CSU run defense
| 143.0 | Rushing YPG vs Rush yards allowed / G | 143.0 |
| 4.2 | Yards / Carry vs Yards / Carry allowed | 4.2 |
| 3.4 | Line yards (post-contact proxy) vs Stuff rate | 12.1% |
| 12.1% | Stuffed-run rate vs Tackles for loss | 6 |
| 0.083 | EPA / Rush vs Defensive EPA / Rush | 0.083 |
CSU passing vs WYO coverage
| 242.0 | Pass yards allowed / G vs Passing YPG | 242.0 |
| 7.1 | Yards / Target allowed vs Completion % | 70.6% |
| 70.6% | Completion % allowed vs Yards / Attempt | 7.1 |
| 0.0% | Sack / pressure rate vs TD / INT ratio | 5.00:1 |
| 0.537 | Defensive EPA / Pass vs EPA / Pass | 0.537 |
Efficiency & situational
| 0.0% | Third-down conversion | 46.7% |
| 273.0 | Total yards / game | 396.0 |
| 396.0 | Yards allowed / game | 273.0 |
| -4 | Turnover margin | +4 |
Red-zone efficiency is not published in the official feed yet, so it is left out rather than estimated.