CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub
UTSA logo

Away · #67

UTSA

2-0 · American Athletic · 31 pts

Week 2 · Final

31 – 26

Texas State logo

Home · #110

Texas State

0-2 · Pac-12 · 26 pts

Sat, Sep 12, 1:30 PM MT UFCU Stadium CW

Vegas Line

Texas State -1.5

Total 66.5

Model Projection

UTSA -1.5

UTSA 55.4% win · O/U 66.5

Value Edge

2.9 pt edge: UTSA

Total delta 0.0

Model Rationale

Shifted by +4.5 pts toward UTSA on the 2026 2-game sample vs. the historical baseline.

Phase
Sample phase
2026 sample
2 games · 50%
Historical baseline
50%
Baseline margin
TXST -0.6

Both rosters returned largely intact this cycle, so the 2021–2025 archive keeps its full weight in the preseason baseline.

UTSA logo

UTSA — Keys to Victory

  1. 1Attack through the air

    Texas State ranks #130 nationally allowing 360.0 pass yards per game — a softer target than their #99 run defense.

  2. 2Contain Jaylen Jenkins

    Texas State's top producer this season: 34 rushing yards (RB). Their production line is the first thing UTSA has to take away.

  3. 3Stay ahead on third down

    UTSA converts 33.3% of third downs (#105 nationally) versus Texas State's 57.1%. Sustaining drives is the cleanest edge on the board.

  4. 4Protect the turnover edge

    UTSA is +2 in turnover margin (2 forced, 0 lost) across 1 recorded games; Texas State sits at -2.

  5. 5Clear 34 points

    The market total for this game is 66.5. Anything above 34 points puts UTSA on the winning side of an even split.

Texas State logo

Texas State — Keys to Victory

  1. 1Establish the run

    UTSA ranks #110 nationally allowing 177.0 rush yards per game — softer than their #101 pass defense.

  2. 2Contain Will Henderson III

    UTSA's top producer this season: 99 rushing yards (RB). Their production line is the first thing Texas State has to take away.

  3. 3Stay ahead on third down

    Texas State converts 57.1% of third downs (#29 nationally) versus UTSA's 33.3%. Sustaining drives is the cleanest edge on the board.

  4. 4Fix the turnover margin

    Texas State is -2 in turnover margin (1 forced, 3 lost) across 1 recorded games; UTSA sits at +2.

  5. 5Clear 34 points

    The market total for this game is 66.5. Anything above 34 points puts Texas State on the winning side of an even split.

Key Position Matchups

Quarterbacks

Owen McCownUTSA · QB

Passing Yds
275
Completion %
81.5%
Yards / Attempt
10.2
TD : INT
3 : 0
TD/INT Ratio
No INTs
Passer Rating
203.7

Brad JacksonTXST · QB

Passing Yds
150
Completion %
65.2%
Yards / Attempt
6.5
TD : INT
0 : 1
TD/INT Ratio
0.00:1
Passer Rating
111.3

Leading Rusher

Will Henderson IIIUTSA · RB

Rushing Yds
99
Carries
9
Yards / Carry
11.0
Rushing TD
1
Long
75

Jaylen JenkinsTXST · RB

Rushing Yds
34
Carries
6
Yards / Carry
5.7
Rushing TD
0
Long
22

Primary Receiver

DJ AllenUTSA · WR

Receiving Yds
116
Receptions
3
Yards / Catch
38.7
Receiving TD
1
Long
62

Tucker CusanoTXST · WR

Receiving Yds
58
Receptions
3
Yards / Catch
19.3
Receiving TD
0
Long
41

Defensive Leader

Joel RogersUTSA · S

Tackles
7
Solo
4
Sacks
0.0
TFL
0.0
INT
0

Terrence Cooks IITXST · LB

Tackles
8
Solo
3
Sacks
0.0
TFL
1.0
INT
0

Matchup Simulator

Starts from the CFB 360 projection for this exact game. Turnover swings are valued at 4.2 points each; pace scales the projected total against a 140-play baseline.

Simulated Winner

UTSA by 1.4

Baseline UTSA -1.5

Simulated Total

66.5

Baseline 66.5

Unit Edge

UTSA QB

TXST FBS average · UTSA FBS average

Open the full simulator

UTSA passing vs TXST coverage

275.0Passing YPG vs Pass yards allowed / G360.0
75.9%Completion % vs Yards / Target allowed10.6
9.5Yards / Attempt vs Completion % allowed76.5%
3.00:1TD / INT ratio vs Sack / pressure rate2.9%
0.462EPA / Pass vs Defensive EPA / Pass0.991

UTSA rushing vs TXST run defense

250.0Rushing YPG vs Rush yards allowed / G156.0
8.6Yards / Carry vs Yards / Carry allowed4.3
3.6Line yards (post-contact proxy) vs Stuff rate37.5%
9.5%Stuffed-run rate vs Tackles for loss8
0.336EPA / Rush vs Defensive EPA / Rush0.023

TXST passing vs UTSA coverage

245.0Pass yards allowed / G vs Passing YPG188.0
5.2Yards / Target allowed vs Completion %69.0%
55.3%Completion % allowed vs Yards / Attempt6.5
2.1%Sack / pressure rate vs TD / INT ratio0.00:1
-0.172Defensive EPA / Pass vs EPA / Pass0.429

Efficiency & situational

33.3%Third-down conversion57.1%
525.0Total yards / game349.0
422.0Yards allowed / game516.0
+2Turnover margin-2

Red-zone efficiency is not published in the official feed yet, so it is left out rather than estimated.