CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub
Utah Tech logo

Away

Utah Tech

0-0 · FCS · 7 pts

Week 1 · Final

7 – 63

BYU logo

Home · #21

BYU

2-0 · Big 12 · 63 pts

Sat, Sep 5, 6:00 PM MT LaVell Edwards Stadium TV not published

Vegas Line

BYU -50.5

Total 61.5

Model Projection

BYU -47.0

BYU 99.9% win · O/U 61.5

Value Edge

3.5 pt edge: UTU

Total delta 0.0

Model Rationale

Preseason baseline: portal composite talent blended with the 2021–2025 archive by roster continuity.

Phase
Preseason baseline
2026 sample
0 games · 0%
Historical baseline
100%
Baseline margin
BYU -11.3
  • BYU: 3 portal additions / 0 departures — 2021–2025 archive weighted 90%, incoming portal talent +2.6 pts.
Utah Tech logo

Utah Tech — Keys to Victory

  1. 1Attack through the air

    BYU ranks #46 nationally allowing 135.0 pass yards per game — a softer target than their #21 run defense.

  2. 2Protect the turnover edge

    Utah Tech is +0 in turnover margin (0 forced, 0 lost) across 1 recorded games; BYU sits at +4.

  3. 3Clear 31 points

    The market total for this game is 61.5. Anything above 31 points puts Utah Tech on the winning side of an even split.

BYU logo

BYU — Keys to Victory

  1. 1Protect the turnover edge

    BYU is +4 in turnover margin (4 forced, 0 lost) across 1 recorded games; Utah Tech sits at +0.

  2. 2Clear 31 points

    The market total for this game is 61.5. Anything above 31 points puts BYU on the winning side of an even split.

Key Position Matchups

Quarterbacks

UTU — data unavailable in the official feed.
BYU — data unavailable in the official feed.

Leading Rusher

UTU — data unavailable in the official feed.
BYU — data unavailable in the official feed.

Primary Receiver

UTU — data unavailable in the official feed.
BYU — data unavailable in the official feed.

Defensive Leader

UTU — data unavailable in the official feed.
BYU — data unavailable in the official feed.

Matchup Simulator

Starts from the CFB 360 projection for this exact game. Turnover swings are valued at 4.2 points each; pace scales the projected total against a 140-play baseline.

Simulated Winner

BYU by 47.0

Baseline BYU -47.0

Simulated Total

61.5

Baseline 61.5

Unit Edge

BYU QB

BYU FBS average · UTU Below average

Open the full simulator

UTU passing vs BYU coverage

0.0Passing YPG vs Pass yards allowed / G135.0
0.0%Completion % vs Yards / Target allowed4.4
0.0Yards / Attempt vs Completion % allowed48.4%
0.00:1TD / INT ratio vs Sack / pressure rate3.2%
0.000EPA / Pass vs Defensive EPA / Pass-0.277

UTU rushing vs BYU run defense

0.0Rushing YPG vs Rush yards allowed / G49.0
0.0Yards / Carry vs Yards / Carry allowed2.0
0.0Line yards (post-contact proxy) vs Stuff rate44.4%
0.0%Stuffed-run rate vs Tackles for loss4
0.000EPA / Rush vs Defensive EPA / Rush-0.265

BYU passing vs UTU coverage

0.0Pass yards allowed / G vs Passing YPG213.0
0.0Yards / Target allowed vs Completion %77.3%
0.0%Completion % allowed vs Yards / Attempt9.7
0.0%Sack / pressure rate vs TD / INT ratio3.00:1
0.000Defensive EPA / Pass vs EPA / Pass0.599

Efficiency & situational

—Third-down conversion81.8%
0.0Total yards / game521.0
0.0Yards allowed / game184.0
0Turnover margin+4

Red-zone efficiency is not published in the official feed yet, so it is left out rather than estimated.