Vegas Line
Syracuse -35.5
Total 56.5
Model Projection
SYR -32.0
SYR 99.3% win · O/U 56.5
Value Edge
3.5 pt edge: UNH
Total delta 0.0
Model Rationale
Preseason baseline: portal composite talent blended with the 2021–2025 archive by roster continuity.
- Phase
- Preseason baseline
- 2026 sample
- 0 games · 0%
- Historical baseline
- 100%
- Baseline margin
- SYR -7.1
- SYR: 1 portal additions / 2 departures — 2021–2025 archive weighted 90%, incoming portal talent −1.2 pts.
New Hampshire — Keys to Victory
1Establish the run
Syracuse ranks #32 nationally allowing 60.0 rush yards per game — softer than their #21 pass defense.
2Contain Shavane Anderson Jr.
Syracuse's top producer this season: 102 rushing yards (RB). Their production line is the first thing New Hampshire has to take away.
3Protect the turnover edge
New Hampshire is +0 in turnover margin (0 forced, 0 lost) across 1 recorded games; Syracuse sits at +3.
4Clear 29 points
The market total for this game is 56.5. Anything above 29 points puts New Hampshire on the winning side of an even split.
Syracuse — Keys to Victory
1Protect the turnover edge
Syracuse is +3 in turnover margin (3 forced, 0 lost) across 1 recorded games; New Hampshire sits at +0.
2Clear 29 points
The market total for this game is 56.5. Anything above 29 points puts Syracuse on the winning side of an even split.
Key Position Matchups
Quarterbacks
Steven AngeliSYR · QB
- Passing Yds
- 263
- Completion %
- 69.0%
- Yards / Attempt
- 9.1
- TD : INT
- 3 : 0
- TD/INT Ratio
- No INTs
- Passer Rating
- 179.3
Leading Rusher
Shavane Anderson Jr.SYR · RB
- Rushing Yds
- 102
- Carries
- 10
- Yards / Carry
- 10.2
- Rushing TD
- 3
- Long
- 37
Primary Receiver
Umari HatcherSYR · WR
- Receiving Yds
- 147
- Receptions
- 8
- Yards / Catch
- 18.4
- Receiving TD
- 2
- Long
- 35
Defensive Leader
Tunmise AdeleyeSYR · DL
- Tackles
- 6
- Solo
- 0
- Sacks
- 0.5
- TFL
- 0.5
- INT
- 0
Matchup Simulator
Starts from the CFB 360 projection for this exact game. Turnover swings are valued at 4.2 points each; pace scales the projected total against a 140-play baseline.
Simulated Winner
SYR by 32.0
Baseline SYR -32.0
Simulated Total
56.5
Baseline 56.5
Unit Edge
SYR QB
SYR Above average · UNH Below average
UNH passing vs SYR coverage
| 0.0 | Passing YPG vs Pass yards allowed / G | 99.0 |
| 0.0% | Completion % vs Yards / Target allowed | 3.8 |
| 0.0 | Yards / Attempt vs Completion % allowed | 57.7% |
| 0.00:1 | TD / INT ratio vs Sack / pressure rate | 19.2% |
| 0.000 | EPA / Pass vs Defensive EPA / Pass | -0.122 |
UNH rushing vs SYR run defense
| 0.0 | Rushing YPG vs Rush yards allowed / G | 60.0 |
| 0.0 | Yards / Carry vs Yards / Carry allowed | 1.8 |
| 0.0 | Line yards (post-contact proxy) vs Stuff rate | 45.5% |
| 0.0% | Stuffed-run rate vs Tackles for loss | 10 |
| 0.000 | EPA / Rush vs Defensive EPA / Rush | -0.221 |
SYR passing vs UNH coverage
| 0.0 | Pass yards allowed / G vs Passing YPG | 275.0 |
| 0.0 | Yards / Target allowed vs Completion % | 64.7% |
| 0.0% | Completion % allowed vs Yards / Attempt | 8.1 |
| 0.0% | Sack / pressure rate vs TD / INT ratio | 4.00:1 |
| 0.000 | Defensive EPA / Pass vs EPA / Pass | 0.521 |
Efficiency & situational
| — | Third-down conversion | 66.7% |
| 0.0 | Total yards / game | 513.0 |
| 0.0 | Yards allowed / game | 159.0 |
| 0 | Turnover margin | +3 |
Red-zone efficiency is not published in the official feed yet, so it is left out rather than estimated.