Vegas Line
Maryland -12.5
Total 52.5
Model Projection
MD -9.0
MD 80.0% win · O/U 52.5
Value Edge
3.5 pt edge: CONN
Total delta 0.0
Model Rationale
Shifted by +4.8 pts toward MD on the 2026 2-game sample vs. the historical baseline.
- Phase
- Sample phase
- 2026 sample
- 2 games · 50%
- Historical baseline
- 50%
- Baseline margin
- MD -0.7
- CONN: 0 portal additions / 1 departures, first year under Jason Candle — 2021–2025 archive weighted 67%, incoming portal talent −0.4 pts.
- MD: 1 portal additions / 3 departures — 2021–2025 archive weighted 87%, incoming portal talent −1.3 pts.

Maryland — Keys to Victory
1Attack through the air
UConn ranks #51 nationally allowing 145.0 pass yards per game — a softer target than their #34 run defense.
2Contain Kalieb Osborne
UConn's top producer this season: 90 rushing yards (QB). Their production line is the first thing Maryland has to take away.
3Stay ahead on third down
Maryland converts 57.1% of third downs (#27 nationally) versus UConn's 50.0%. Sustaining drives is the cleanest edge on the board.
4Protect the turnover edge
Maryland is +3 in turnover margin (3 forced, 0 lost) across 1 recorded games; UConn sits at -2.
5Clear 27 points
The market total for this game is 52.5. Anything above 27 points puts Maryland on the winning side of an even split.

UConn — Keys to Victory
1Attack through the air
Maryland ranks #9 nationally allowing 75.0 pass yards per game — a softer target than their #7 run defense.
2Contain DeJuan Williams
Maryland's top producer this season: 116 rushing yards (RB). Their production line is the first thing UConn has to take away.
3Stay ahead on third down
UConn converts 50.0% of third downs (#53 nationally) versus Maryland's 57.1%. Sustaining drives is the cleanest edge on the board.
4Fix the turnover margin
UConn is -2 in turnover margin (0 forced, 2 lost) across 1 recorded games; Maryland sits at +3.
5Clear 27 points
The market total for this game is 52.5. Anything above 27 points puts UConn on the winning side of an even split.
Key Position Matchups
Quarterbacks
Malik WashingtonMD · QB
- Passing Yds
- 186
- Completion %
- 61.3%
- Yards / Attempt
- 6.0
- TD : INT
- 1 : 0
- TD/INT Ratio
- No INTs
- Passer Rating
- 122.3
Kalieb OsborneCONN · QB
- Passing Yds
- 265
- Completion %
- 73.1%
- Yards / Attempt
- 10.2
- TD : INT
- 2 : 1
- TD/INT Ratio
- 2.00:1
- Passer Rating
- 176.4
Leading Rusher
DeJuan WilliamsMD · RB
- Rushing Yds
- 116
- Carries
- 3
- Yards / Carry
- 38.7
- Rushing TD
- 2
- Long
- 94
Kalieb OsborneCONN · QB
- Rushing Yds
- 90
- Carries
- 8
- Yards / Carry
- 11.3
- Rushing TD
- 2
- Long
- 30
Primary Receiver
Na'eem Abdul-Rahim GladdingMD · WR
- Receiving Yds
- 57
- Receptions
- 6
- Yards / Catch
- 9.5
- Receiving TD
- 1
- Long
- 20
Javon BrownCONN · WR
- Receiving Yds
- 92
- Receptions
- 6
- Yards / Catch
- 15.3
- Receiving TD
- 1
- Long
- 29
Defensive Leader
Trey ReddickMD · LB
- Tackles
- 5
- Solo
- 2
- Sacks
- 0.0
- TFL
- 0.5
- INT
- 0
Jalil MartinCONN · DB
- Tackles
- 5
- Solo
- 2
- Sacks
- 0.0
- TFL
- 0.0
- INT
- 0
Matchup Simulator
Starts from the CFB 360 projection for this exact game. Turnover swings are valued at 4.2 points each; pace scales the projected total against a 140-play baseline.
Simulated Winner
MD by 9.0
Baseline MD -9.0
Simulated Total
52.5
Baseline 52.5
Unit Edge
MD QB
CONN FBS average · MD FBS average
MD passing vs CONN coverage
| 281.0 | Passing YPG vs Pass yards allowed / G | 145.0 |
| 65.8% | Completion % vs Yards / Target allowed | 3.5 |
| 7.4 | Yards / Attempt vs Completion % allowed | 50.0% |
| 2.00:1 | TD / INT ratio vs Sack / pressure rate | 4.8% |
| 0.280 | EPA / Pass vs Defensive EPA / Pass | -0.332 |
MD rushing vs CONN run defense
| 365.0 | Rushing YPG vs Rush yards allowed / G | 64.0 |
| 9.1 | Yards / Carry vs Yards / Carry allowed | 2.1 |
| 3.8 | Line yards (post-contact proxy) vs Stuff rate | 50.0% |
| 17.6% | Stuffed-run rate vs Tackles for loss | 4 |
| 0.556 | EPA / Rush vs Defensive EPA / Rush | -0.185 |
CONN passing vs MD coverage
| 75.0 | Pass yards allowed / G vs Passing YPG | 370.0 |
| 3.9 | Yards / Target allowed vs Completion % | 75.8% |
| 52.6% | Completion % allowed vs Yards / Attempt | 11.2 |
| 26.3% | Sack / pressure rate vs TD / INT ratio | 1.50:1 |
| -0.038 | Defensive EPA / Pass vs EPA / Pass | 0.597 |
Efficiency & situational
| 57.1% | Third-down conversion | 50.0% |
| 646.0 | Total yards / game | 671.0 |
| 85.0 | Yards allowed / game | 209.0 |
| +3 | Turnover margin | -2 |
Red-zone efficiency is not published in the official feed yet, so it is left out rather than estimated.