CFB 360 is currently a work in progress! Learn more about our unbiased ranking engine & upcoming Player Recruiting Hub
Indiana State logo

Away

Indiana State

0-0 · FCS · 19 pts

Week 1 · Final

19 – 44

Purdue logo

Home · #49

Purdue

1-1 · Big Ten · 44 pts

Fri, Sep 4, 5:00 PM MT Ross-Ade Stadium BTN

Vegas Line

Purdue -34.5

Total 55.5

Model Projection

PUR -31.0

PUR 99.2% win · O/U 55.5

Value Edge

3.5 pt edge: IU

Total delta 0.0

Model Rationale

Preseason baseline: portal composite talent blended with the 2021–2025 archive by roster continuity.

Phase
Preseason baseline
2026 sample
0 games · 0%
Historical baseline
100%
Baseline margin
PUR -5.1
  • PUR: 5 portal additions / 2 departures — 2021–2025 archive weighted 78%, incoming portal talent +1.7 pts.
Indiana State logo

Indiana State — Keys to Victory

  1. 1Attack through the air

    Purdue ranks #88 nationally allowing 218.0 pass yards per game — a softer target than their #35 run defense.

  2. 2Protect the turnover edge

    Indiana State is +0 in turnover margin (0 forced, 0 lost) across 1 recorded games; Purdue sits at +1.

  3. 3Clear 28 points

    The market total for this game is 55.5. Anything above 28 points puts Indiana State on the winning side of an even split.

Purdue logo

Purdue — Keys to Victory

  1. 1Protect the turnover edge

    Purdue is +1 in turnover margin (1 forced, 0 lost) across 1 recorded games; Indiana State sits at +0.

  2. 2Clear 28 points

    The market total for this game is 55.5. Anything above 28 points puts Purdue on the winning side of an even split.

Key Position Matchups

Quarterbacks

IU — data unavailable in the official feed.
PUR — data unavailable in the official feed.

Leading Rusher

IU — data unavailable in the official feed.
PUR — data unavailable in the official feed.

Primary Receiver

IU — data unavailable in the official feed.
PUR — data unavailable in the official feed.

Defensive Leader

IU — data unavailable in the official feed.
PUR — data unavailable in the official feed.

Matchup Simulator

Starts from the CFB 360 projection for this exact game. Turnover swings are valued at 4.2 points each; pace scales the projected total against a 140-play baseline.

Simulated Winner

PUR by 31.0

Baseline PUR -31.0

Simulated Total

55.5

Baseline 55.5

Unit Edge

PUR QB

PUR Above average · IU Below average

Open the full simulator

IU passing vs PUR coverage

0.0Passing YPG vs Pass yards allowed / G218.0
0.0%Completion % vs Yards / Target allowed9.9
0.0Yards / Attempt vs Completion % allowed54.5%
0.00:1TD / INT ratio vs Sack / pressure rate13.6%
0.000EPA / Pass vs Defensive EPA / Pass-0.106

IU rushing vs PUR run defense

0.0Rushing YPG vs Rush yards allowed / G66.0
0.0Yards / Carry vs Yards / Carry allowed2.8
0.0Line yards (post-contact proxy) vs Stuff rate37.5%
0.0%Stuffed-run rate vs Tackles for loss8
0.000EPA / Rush vs Defensive EPA / Rush0.035

PUR passing vs IU coverage

0.0Pass yards allowed / G vs Passing YPG346.0
0.0Yards / Target allowed vs Completion %79.4%
0.0%Completion % allowed vs Yards / Attempt10.2
0.0%Sack / pressure rate vs TD / INT ratio3.00:1
0.000Defensive EPA / Pass vs EPA / Pass0.854

Efficiency & situational

—Third-down conversion54.5%
0.0Total yards / game523.0
0.0Yards allowed / game284.0
0Turnover margin+1

Red-zone efficiency is not published in the official feed yet, so it is left out rather than estimated.